SvelteKit and Supabase app

Demo, testing, prototyping, etc. Mainly for learning.

Basic architecture

I have tried to separate client and server logic as much as possible. The basic idea is that the client should never directly communicate with any endpoint (at all).

This shall be the responsibility of the "Services" (perhaps it would be more prudent to call them controllers, though)

So basically:

Client -> Service -> Endpoint -> Supabase.

Why?

The reason I do it this way is mainly because I want to see if it is possible to maintain this architecture as the project grows. I believe it will scale well when and if the application grows. It may seem to be over-engineered (and maybe it is) but I think that it will in the long run improve code readability and prevent "boilerplate code redundancy". Components/pages will all have common entry into the the "inner workings" of the application via the services, to ensure that every request will be processed identically.

Top categories

svelte logo

Need a Svelte website built?

Hire a professional Svelte developer today.
Loading Svelte Themes